🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension sparked by the announcement of a new 28-point plan for ending the war appeared – temporarily – to have been stabilised. A Washington representative spoke of "notable headway" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its retaliation: another massive barrage of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Negotiation and Warfare

The sequence of opposing developments captured the harsh reality of the outgoing year. By day, negotiation efforts are waged: optimistic declarations are released from different nations. Significant resources is devoted on restraining specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the primary tool for achieving "resolution".

Nocturnal Warfare

As Russia's attack developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's exposure was laid bare. Ukraine is equipped to monitor missile launches from Russian territory, a ability enabled by up-to-date information. From witness perspectives, military aircraft that had been deployed to engage hostile cruise missiles roared overhead – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's missile defense thundered: multiple launches deployed against a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, most likely provided by Western nations. Every launch jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The moment of terror quickly becomes resigned acknowledgment: perhaps the incoming missile won't cause damage this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and further power outages.

Continuous Dangers

Soon after, a heavy machine gun fired at a drone somewhere nearby, part of a rapid response unit – probably Western-made equipment. Unfortunately, the bullets missed the opposing UAV – it pressed on overhead toward its target.

Intermittently, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the early updates: multiple fatalities, devastation and utility failures in multiple buildings as a result of the evening attack. As always, everyone still maintained normal activities – living the war. But those full day illustrated Ukraine's vital need on Western support – a reliance that regional partners are evidently unprepared to substitute in the short term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The 28-point plan from US administration sparked intense emotion, discussion and profound anxiety – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after prior negotiation attempts and multilateral gatherings.

Every new initiative from US leadership unfolds according to the identical sequence: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, effectively counters. They contain the crisis but never actually achieve victory. This cycle will, no doubt, endure.

Political Considerations

It is easy to blame certain parties of consistently pushing Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration operates on a assumption understood by experienced diplomats: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The American government believes that it is impossible to pressure the Kremlin to relinquish the land that it currently occupies in Ukraine's south or east.

The problem is that while recognising this factual reality, American administration does little to prevent Kremlin actions, through diplomacy or military means, from assuming that the situation will not evolve additionally in its favour in the near future.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Russian leadership is convinced that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its partners are approaching exhaustion. Their reason to accept conditions that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is almost completely absent. There may be many attempts to stop fighting, but they will continue as long as Russia's leader remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still persist, gradually sacrificing civilians and areas but averting a total frontline collapse until conditions improve in its advantage.

Existing Situation

Realistically, there are no real preconditions for a truce. Now, subjective factors are entering the equation: political desires to broker a ceasefire and secure international recognition, and Kyiv's double obstacles – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the country's interests against any plan Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their attention does not move to domestic problems. And although their mission will now be significantly challenging after recent developments, it remains quite doubtful that this will modify their basic position.

These two forces are driving the talks.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a only one week to eliminate the proposed articles of the latest plan. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by American leadership, resistance by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new proposals based on established approaches are approaching, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off political attacks from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and demonstrate specific hesitation to change the course of events, if they remain united and strengthen their defence capabilities at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the predictable period, mainly require sustained allied backing.